Bacterial injections into tumors show early promise for treating cancer @ Genome Editing with CRISPR-Cas9 & Jennifer Doudna (UC Berkeley / HHMI): Genome Engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 @ What you need to know about CRISPR | Ellen Jorgensen & Gene Silencing by microRNAs @ RNA interference (RNAi): by Nature Video @ DNA animations by for science-art exhibition & ´´In the fields of molecular biology and genetics, a genome is the genetic material of an organism. It consists of DNA (or RNA in RNA viruses). The genome includes both the genes (the coding regions) and the noncoding DNA,[1] as well as mitochondrial DNA[2] and chloroplast DNA. The study of the genome is called genomics.´´The term genome was created in 1920 by Hans Winkler,[3] professor of botany at the University of Hamburg, Germany. The Oxford Dictionary suggests the name is a blend of the words gene and chromosome.[4] However, see omics for a more thorough discussion. A few related -ome words already existed, such as biome and rhizome, forming a vocabulary into which genome fits systematically.[5]´´ @ Links and videos

Do the downloads!! Share!! The diffusion of very important information and knowledge is essential for the world progress always!! Thanks!!

  • – – > > Mestrado – Dissertation – Tabelas, Figuras e Gráficos – Tables, Figures and Graphics – ´´My´´ Dissertation #Innovation #Countries #Time #Researches #Reference #Graphics #Ages #Age #Mice #People #Person #Mouse #Genetics #PersonalizedMedicine #Diagnosis #Prognosis #Treatment #Disease #UnknownDiseases #Future #VeryEfficientDrugs #VeryEfficientVaccines #VeryEfficientTherapeuticalSubstances #Tests #Laboratories #Investments #Details #HumanLongevity #DNA #Cell #Memory #Physiology #Nanomedicine #Nanotechnology #Biochemistry #NewMedicalDevices #GeneticEngineering #Internet #History #Science #World

Pathol Res Pract. 2012 Jul 15;208(7):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2012.04.006. Epub 2012 Jun 8.

The influence of physical activity in the progression of experimental lung cancer in mice

Renato Batista Paceli 1Rodrigo Nunes CalCarlos Henrique Ferreira dos SantosJosé Antonio CordeiroCassiano Merussi NeivaKazuo Kawano NagaminePatrícia Maluf Cury


GRUPO_AF1 – GROUP AFA1 – Aerobic Physical Activity – Atividade Física Aeróbia – ´´My´´ Dissertation – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto

GRUPO AFAN 1 – GROUP AFAN1 – Anaerobic Physical Activity – Atividade Física Anaeróbia – ´´My´´ Dissertation – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto

GRUPO_AF2 – GROUP AFA2 – Aerobic Physical Activity – Atividade Física Aeróbia – ´´My´´ Dissertation – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto

GRUPO AFAN 2 – GROUP AFAN 2 – Anaerobic Physical Activity – Atividade Física Anaeróbia – ´´My´´ Dissertation – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto

Slides – mestrado – ´´My´´ Dissertation – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto



Avaliação da influência da atividade física aeróbia e anaeróbia na progressão do câncer de pulmão experimental – Summary – Resumo – ´´My´´ Dissertation – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto


Lung cancer is one of the most incident neoplasms in the world, representing the main cause of mortality for cancer. Many epidemiologic studies have suggested that physical activity may reduce the risk of lung cancer, other works evaluate the effectiveness of the use of the physical activity in the suppression, remission and reduction of the recurrence of tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of aerobic and anaerobic physical activity in the development and the progression of lung cancer. Lung tumors were induced with a dose of 3mg of urethane/kg, in 67 male Balb – C type mice, divided in three groups: group 1_24 mice treated with urethane and without physical activity; group 2_25 mice with urethane and subjected to aerobic swimming free exercise; group 3_18 mice with urethane, subjected to anaerobic swimming exercise with gradual loading 5-20% of body weight. All the animals were sacrificed after 20 weeks, and lung lesions were analyzed. The median number of lesions (nodules and hyperplasia) was 3.0 for group 1, 2.0 for group 2 and 1.5-3 (p=0.052). When comparing only the presence or absence of lesion, there was a decrease in the number of lesions in group 3 as compared with group 1 (p=0.03) but not in relation to group 2. There were no metastases or other changes in other organs. The anaerobic physical activity, but not aerobic, diminishes the incidence of experimental lung tumors.

´´We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries.´´ Published:  Daniel J. Benjamin, James O. Berger, […]Valen E. Johnson Nature Human Behaviour volume 2, pages6–10 (2018)

Um mundo além de p < 0,05 « Sandra Merlo – Fonoaudiologia da Fluência

´´My´´ Monografia – Monograph – Induction of benznidazole resistance in human Trypanosoma cruzi isolates – Indução de resistência ao benzonidazol em isolados humanos de Trypanosoma cruzi – UFTM – Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro – Uberaba 

Avaliação da influência da atividade física aeróbia e anaeróbia na progressão do câncer de pulmão experimental – Summary – Resumo

Article – ´´My´´ dissertation – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto

Feedback positivo de pessoas sobre minha dissertação pelo Messenger – Facebook. Positive feedback of people about my dissertation, blog and YouTube channel by Facebook – Messenger. Year – Ano: 2018


My suggestion of a very important Project…

Apostila – Pubmed

A Psicossomática Psicanalítica – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto

ÁCIDO HIALURÔNICO – HIALURONIC ACID – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto

Slides – Mestrado final – ´´My´´ dissertation – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto

Avaliação da influência da atividade física aeróbia e anaeróbia na progressão do câncer de pulmão experimental – Summary – Resumo

O Homem como Sujeito da Realidade da Saúde – Redação – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto

Aula_Resultados – Results – FAMERP – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto

As credenciais da ciência – The credentials of Science – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto BaixarFrases que digitei – Phrases I typed

Frases que digitei – Tecnologia – Informations about blog I did





aging – animal models

Nanomedicine an evolving research (Opinion article I typed)


Will you embrace AI fast enough

MICROBIOLOGIA – MICROBIOLOGY – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto

Genes e Epilepsia – Genes and epilepsy – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto




p-Value – Valor de p



Skip to main contentBecome a MemberLog InScienceMag.orgSearch



The unusual strategy of injecting live bacteria into tumors may be helping some cancer patients, according to a small clinical trial. ISTOCK.COM/BRIANAJACKSON

Bacterial injections into tumors show early promise for treating cancer

By Jennifer Couzin-FrankelOct. 1, 2018 , 5:10 PM

NEW YORK CITY—“Live bacteria” and “cancer treatment” may not sound like a promising match, but certain microbes seem able to stall tumor growth when injected into the tumors, according to data presented here on 30 September at the Fourth International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference. The injections appear to activate an immune response that also targets the tumor. There are still questions about the safety of the approach. But given how many patients develop resistance or don’t respond to current cancer treatments, bacterial injections have generated enough interest that they’re part of a new clinical trial combining bacteria with an established immune therapy.

The research carries echoes of a more-than-a-century-old experiment. In the 1890s, oncologist William Coley began to inject cancer patients who had inoperable tumors with a mixture of killed bacteria. Coley reported success with the approach and “Coley’s toxins” were sold as a cancer therapy in the United States even into the 1960s. But other doctors questioned Coley’s results, and the treatment was overtaken by chemotherapy and radiation, which became standard in cancer.

Four years ago, a large team of cancer scientists suggested bacterial injections might be a valid way to treat cancer after all. They published a paper in Science Translational Medicine describing how in six out of 16 dogs with solid tumors, the masses shrank or even disappeared when injected with live copies of the bacterium Clostridium novyi. In that work, the research team first removed a toxin-producing gene from the live bacteria. Encouraged by how the dogs fared, the group also treated a 53-year-old woman with leiomyosarcoma, a form of cancer that begins in smooth muscles. Her tumor shrank as well, though she later sought other treatment for the cancer.


Get more great content like this delivered right to you!

That patient is now the first of many. In additional clinical work led by medical oncologist Filip Janku at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, who was part of the scientific team 4 years earlier, 23 more patients with advanced sarcoma or other solid tumors ranging from breast cancer to melanoma got a single injection into their tumor of anywhere from 10,000 to 3 million Clostridium spores, a dormant form of the bacteria. The research team was surprised and excited by the bacteria’s antitumor effects. Nineteen patients, including that first woman, saw their cancers stabilize, which meant their tumors didn’t continue to grow after treatment. Even though the injections were local, the bacteria also seemed to sometimes stabilize and reduce tumor growth elsewhere in the body as seen on imaging, Janku says.

An inflammatory response to spores may generate the key anticancer immune action, he and his colleagues speculate. In 11 of the patients, the researchers saw evidence—fever, pain, and swelling at the injection sites—that the spores had germinated, the process by which the dormant bacteria resume active reproduction.

The strategy was so new that the scientists weren’t sure the dose would matter, especially because they hoped the spores would become active once inside the tumor. It turned out that how many spores were injected was a key safety consideration: The two patients who received the highest of six doses developed gangrene and sepsis, a life-threatening response to infection. A third patient, also in a higher dose group, got sepsis, too.

“We haven’t done a deep dive into the mechanism,” Janku says. The nonspore bacteria release various enzymes that can break down tumor cells, and just like any invader, they send the immune system into an inflammatory state that may target cancer masses as well. But the details remain mysterious.

Still, based on the stabilized tumor masses in so many patients, “you know it’s working,” says Dzana Dervovic, an immunologist at the Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute in Toronto, Canada, who is especially interested in the fevers that tracked with cancer responses.

The trial was primarily meant to establish the immediate safety of the bacterial injections—though it offers hints of antitumor action it wasn’t designed to assess survival, or even how patients fared long-term. The patients, who were treated between 2013 and 2017, received just one injection (with the exception of one person who requested and got a second months later, which was not effective), and then went on to other treatments. To learn more, Janku opened another small trial earlier this year, with support from two companies, to test Clostridium in combination with a “checkpoint inhibitor” drug that helps unleash the immune system against tumors. Such drugs are an increasingly popular immunotherapy strategy, one that was today recognized with a Nobel Prize.Posted in: 


Jennifer Couzin-Frankel

Jennifer Couzin-Frankel

Staff Writer

More from News

Enjoy reading News from Science? Subscribe today. If you have already subscribed, log into your News account.

Got a tip?

How to contact the news team




More ScienceInsider


More Sifter

Read the Latest Issue of Science

20 December 2019

Vol 366, Issue 6472

Magazine Cover

Table of Contents

Get Our E-Alerts

Receive emails from Science. See full listScience Table of ContentsScience Daily NewsWeekly News RoundupScience Editor’s ChoiceFirst Release NotificationScience Careers Job SeekerCountryCountry*AfghanistanAland IslandsAlbaniaAlgeriaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBolivia, Plurinational State ofBonaire, Sint Eustatius and SabaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBrunei DarussalamBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCongoCongo, The Democratic Republic of theCook IslandsCosta RicaCote D’IvoireCroatiaCubaCuraçaoCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Faroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuatemalaGuernseyGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHeard Island and Mcdonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)HondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIran, Islamic Republic ofIraqIrelandIsle of ManIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJerseyJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKorea, Democratic People’s Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwaitKyrgyzstanLao People’s Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacaoMacedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMoldova, Republic ofMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorwayOmanPakistanPalestinianPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalQatarReunionRomaniaRussian FederationRWANDASaint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da CunhaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Martin (French part)Saint Pierre and MiquelonSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSint Maarten (Dutch part)SlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan MayenSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwanTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailandTimor-LesteTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofVietnamVirgin Islands, BritishWallis and FutunaWestern SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabwe

Email I agree to receive emails from AAAS/Science
and Science advertisers, including information on 
products, services, and special offers which may
include but are not limited to news, career
information, & upcoming events.Sign up today

Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*)


© 2019 American Association for the Advancement of Science. All rights Reserved. AAAS is a partner of HINARIAGORAOARECHORUSCLOCKSSCrossRef and COUNTER.

Wiki Loves LovePhotograph your local culture, help Wikipedia and win!



From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to navigationJump to searchFor a non-technical introduction to the topic, see Introduction to genetics. For other uses, see Genome (disambiguation).

Part of a series on
Key components
History and topics
IntroductionHistoryEvolution (molecular)Population geneticsMendelian inheritanceQuantitative geneticsMolecular genetics
DNA sequencingGenetic engineeringGenomics (Template template)Medical genetics
Branches of genetics
Personalized medicine
Personalized medicine

An image of the 46 chromosomes making up the diploid genome of a human male. (The mitochondrial chromosome is not shown.)

In the fields of molecular biology and genetics, a genome is the genetic material of an organism. It consists of DNA (or RNA in RNA viruses). The genome includes both the genes (the coding regions) and the noncoding DNA,[1] as well as mitochondrial DNA[2] and chloroplast DNA. The study of the genome is called genomics.


Origin of term[edit]

The term genome was created in 1920 by Hans Winkler,[3] professor of botany at the University of Hamburg, Germany. The Oxford Dictionary suggests the name is a blend of the words gene and chromosome.[4] However, see omics for a more thorough discussion. A few related -ome words already existed, such as biome and rhizome, forming a vocabulary into which genome fits systematically.[5]

Sequencing and mapping[edit]

Further information: Genome project

A genome sequence is the complete list of the nucleotides (A, C, G, and T for DNA genomes) that make up all the chromosomes of an individual or a species. Within a species, the vast majority of nucleotides are identical between individuals, but sequencing multiple individuals is necessary to understand the genetic diversity.Part of DNA sequence – prototypification of complete genome of virus

In 1976, Walter Fiers at the University of Ghent (Belgium) was the first to establish the complete nucleotide sequence of a viral RNA-genome (Bacteriophage MS2). The next year, Fred Sanger completed the first DNA-genome sequence: Phage Φ-X174, of 5386 base pairs.[6] The first complete genome sequences among all three domains of life were released within a short period during the mid-1990s: The first bacterial genome to be sequenced was that of Haemophilus influenzae, completed by a team at The Institute for Genomic Research in 1995. A few months later, the first eukaryotic genome was completed, with sequences of the 16 chromosomes of budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae published as the result of a European-led effort begun in the mid-1980s. The first genome sequence for an archaeonMethanococcus jannaschii, was completed in 1996, again by The Institute for Genomic Research.

The development of new technologies has made genome sequencing dramatically cheaper and easier, and the number of complete genome sequences is growing rapidly. The US National Institutes of Health maintains one of several comprehensive databases of genomic information.[7] Among the thousands of completed genome sequencing projects include those for rice, a mouse, the plant Arabidopsis thaliana, the puffer fish, and the bacteria E. coli. In December 2013, scientists first sequenced the entire genome of a Neanderthal, an extinct species of humans. The genome was extracted from the toe bone of a 130,000-year-old Neanderthal found in a Siberian cave.[8][9]

New sequencing technologies, such as massive parallel sequencing have also opened up the prospect of personal genome sequencing as a diagnostic tool, as pioneered by Manteia Predictive Medicine. A major step toward that goal was the completion in 2007 of the full genome of James D. Watson, one of the co-discoverers of the structure of DNA.[10]

Whereas a genome sequence lists the order of every DNA base in a genome, a genome map identifies the landmarks. A genome map is less detailed than a genome sequence and aids in navigating around the genome. The Human Genome Project was organized to map and to sequence the human genome. A fundamental step in the project was the release of a detailed genomic map by Jean Weissenbach and his team at the Genoscope in Paris.[11][12]

Reference genome sequences and maps continue to be updated, removing errors and clarifying regions of high allelic complexity.[13] The decreasing cost of genomic mapping has permitted genealogical sites to offer it as a service,[14] to the extent that one may submit one’s genome to crowdsourced scientific endeavours such as DNA.LAND at the New York Genome Center,[15] an example both of the economies of scale and of citizen science.[16]

Viral genomes[edit]

Viral genomes can be composed of either RNA or DNA. The genomes of RNA viruses can be either single-stranded or double-stranded RNA, and may contain one or more separate RNA molecules. DNA viruses can have either single-stranded or double-stranded genomes. Most DNA virus genomes are composed of a single, linear molecule of DNA, but some are made up of a circular DNA molecule.[17]

Prokaryotic genomes[edit]

Prokaryotes and eukaryotes have DNA genomes. Archaea have a single circular chromosome.[18] Most bacteria also have a single circular chromosome; however, some bacterial species have linear chromosomes[19] or multiple chromosomes.[20] If the DNA is replicated faster than the bacterial cells divide, multiple copies of the chromosome can be present in a single cell, and if the cells divide faster than the DNA can be replicated, multiple replication of the chromosome is initiated before the division occurs, allowing daughter cells to inherit complete genomes and already partially replicated chromosomes. Most prokaryotes have very little repetitive DNA in their genomes.[21] However, some symbiotic bacteria (e.g. Serratia symbiotica) have reduced genomes and a high fraction of pseudogenes: only ~40% of their DNA encodes proteins.[22][23]

Some bacteria have auxiliary genetic material, also part of their genome, which is carried in plasmids. For this, the word genome should not be used as a synonym of chromosome.

Eukaryotic genomes[edit]

Eukaryotic genomes are composed of one or more linear DNA chromosomes. The number of chromosomes varies widely from Jack jumper ants and an asexual nemotode,[24] which each have only one pair, to a fern species that has 720 pairs.[25] A typical human cell has two copies of each of 22 autosomes, one inherited from each parent, plus two sex chromosomes, making it diploid. Gametes, such as ova, sperm, spores, and pollen, are haploid, meaning they carry only one copy of each chromosome.

In addition to the chromosomes in the nucleus, organelles such as the chloroplasts and mitochondria have their own DNA. Mitochondria are sometimes said to have their own genome often referred to as the “mitochondrial genome“. The DNA found within the chloroplast may be referred to as the “plastome“. Like the bacteria they originated from, mitochondria and chloroplasts have a circular chromosome.

Unlike prokaryotes, eukaryotes have exon-intron organization of protein coding genes and variable amounts of repetitive DNA. In mammals and plants, the majority of the genome is composed of repetitive DNA.[26]

Coding sequences[edit]

DNA sequences that carry the instructions to make proteins are coding sequences. The proportion of the genome occupied by coding sequences varies widely. A larger genome does not necessarily contain more genes, and the proportion of non-repetitive DNA decreases along with increasing genome size in complex eukaryotes.[26]

Simple eukaryotes such as C. elegans and fruit fly, have more non-repetitive DNA than repetitive DNA,[26][27] while the genomes of more complex eukaryotes tend to be composed largely of repetitive DNA. In some plants and amphibians, the proportion of repetitive DNA is more than 80%.[26] Similarly, only 2% of the human genome codes for proteins.Composition of the human genome

Noncoding sequences[edit]

Noncoding sequences include introns, sequences for non-coding RNAs, regulatory regions, and repetitive DNA. Noncoding sequences make up 98% of the human genome. There are two categories of repetitive DNA in the genome: tandem repeats and interspersed repeats.[28]

Tandem repeats[edit]

Short, non-coding sequences that are repeated head-to-tail are called tandem repeats. Microsatellites consisting of 2-5 basepair repeats, while minisatellite repeats are 30-35 bp. Tandem repeats make up about 4% of the human genome and 9% of the fruit fly genome.[29] Tandem repeats can be functional. For example, telomeres are composed of the tandem repeat TTAGGG in mammals, and they play an important role in protecting the ends of the chromosome.

In other cases, expansions in the number of tandem repeats in exons or introns can cause disease.[30] For example, the human gene huntingtin typically contains 6–29 tandem repeats of the nucleotides CAG (encoding a polyglutamine tract). An expansion to over 36 repeats results in Huntington’s disease, a neurodegenerative disease. Twenty human disorders are known to result from similar tandem repeat expansions in various genes. The mechanism by which proteins with expanded polygulatamine tracts cause death of neurons is not fully understood. One possibility is that the proteins fail to fold properly and avoid degradation, instead accumulating in aggregates that also sequester important transcription factors, thereby altering gene expression.[30]

Tandem repeats are usually caused by slippage during replication, unequal crossing-over and gene conversion.[31]

Transposable elements[edit]

Transposable elements (TEs) are sequences of DNA with a defined structure that are able to change their location in the genome.[29][21][32] TEs are categorized as either class I TEs, which replicate by a copy-and-paste mechanism, or class II TEs, which can be excised from the genome and inserted at a new location.

The movement of TEs is a driving force of genome evolution in eukaryotes because their insertion can disrupt gene functions, homologous recombination between TEs can produce duplications, and TE can shuffle exons and regulatory sequences to new locations.[33]


Retrotransposons can be transcribed into RNA, which are then duplicated at another site into the genome.[34] Retrotransposons can be divided into Long terminal repeats (LTRs) and Non-Long Terminal Repeats (Non-LTR).[33]

Long terminal repeats (LTRs) are derived from ancient retroviral infections, so they encode proteins related to retroviral proteins including gag (structural proteins of the virus), pol (reverse transcriptase and integrase), pro (protease), and in some cases env (envelope) genes.[32] These genes are flanked by long repeats at both 5′ and 3′ ends. It has been reported that LTRs consist of the largest fraction in most plant genome and might account for the huge variation in genome size.[35]

Non-long terminal repeats (Non-LTRs) are classified as long interspersed elements (LINEs), short interspersed elements (SINEs), and Penelope-like elements. In Dictyostelium discoideum, there is another DIRS-like elements belong to Non-LTRs. Non-LTRs are widely spread in eukaryotic genomes.[36]

Long interspersed elements (LINEs) encode genes for reverse transcriptase and endonuclease, making them autonomous transposable elements. The human genome has around 500,000 LINEs, taking around 17% of the genome.[37]

Short interspersed elements (SINEs) are usually less than 500 base pairs and are non-autonomous, so they rely on the proteins encoded by LINEs for transposition.[38] The Alu element is the most common SINE found in primates. It is about 350 base pairs and occupies about 11% of the human genome with around 1,500,000 copies.[33]

DNA transposons[edit]

DNA transposons encode a transposase enzyme between inverted terminal repeats. When expressed, the transposase recognizes the terminal inverted repeats that flank the transposon and catalyzes its excision and reinsertion in a new site.[29] This cut-and-paste mechanism typically reinserts transposons near their original location (within 100kb).[33] DNA transposons are found in bacteria and make up 3% of the human genome and 12% of the genome of the roundworm C. elegans.[33]

Genome size[edit]

Log-log plot of the total number of annotated proteins in genomes submitted to GenBank as a function of genome size.

Genome size is the total number of DNA base pairs in one copy of a haploid genome. In humans, the nuclear genome comprises approximately 3.2 billion nucleotides of DNA, divided into 24 linear molecules, the shortest 50 000 000 nucleotides in length and the longest 260 000 000 nucleotides, each contained in a different chromosome.[39] The genome size is positively correlated with the morphological complexity among prokaryotes and lower eukaryotes; however, after mollusks and all the other higher eukaryotes above, this correlation is no longer effective.[26][40] This phenomenon also indicates the mighty influence coming from repetitive DNA on the genomes.

Since genomes are very complex, one research strategy is to reduce the number of genes in a genome to the bare minimum and still have the organism in question survive. There is experimental work being done on minimal genomes for single cell organisms as well as minimal genomes for multi-cellular organisms (see Developmental biology). The work is both in vivo and in silico.[41][42]

Here is a table of some significant or representative genomes. See #See also for lists of sequenced genomes.

Organism typeOrganismGenome size
(base pairs)
Approx. no. of genesNote
VirusPorcine circovirus type 11,7591.8kbSmallest viruses replicating autonomously in eukaryotic cells.[43]
VirusBacteriophage MS23,5693.5kbFirst sequenced RNA-genome[44]
VirusPhage Φ-X1745,3865.4kbFirst sequenced DNA-genome[46]
VirusPhage λ48,50248.5kbOften used as a vector for the cloning of recombinant DNA.[48] [49] [50]
VirusMegavirus1,259,1971.3MbUntil 2013 the largest known viral genome.[51]
VirusPandoravirus salinus2,470,0002.47MbLargest known viral genome.[52]
BacteriumNasuia deltocephalinicola (strain NAS-ALF)112,091112kbSmallest non-viral genome.[53]
BacteriumCarsonella ruddii159,662160kb
BacteriumBuchnera aphidicola600,000600kb[54]
BacteriumWigglesworthia glossinidia700,000700Kb
BacteriumHaemophilus influenzae1,830,0001.8MbFirst genome of a living organism sequenced, July 1995[55]
BacteriumEscherichia coli4,600,0004.6Mb4288[56]
BacteriumSolibacter usitatus (strain Ellin 6076)9,970,00010Mb[57]
Bacterium – cyanobacteriumProchlorococcus spp. (1.7 Mb)1,700,0001.7Mb1884Smallest known cyanobacterium genome[58][59]
Bacterium – cyanobacteriumNostoc punctiforme9,000,0009Mb74327432 open reading frames[60]
AmoeboidPolychaos dubium (“Amoeba” dubia)670,000,000,000670GbLargest known genome.[61] (Disputed)[62]
Eukaryotic organelleHuman mitochondrion16,56916.6kb[63]
PlantGenlisea tuberosa61,000,00061MbSmallest recorded flowering plant genome, 2014.[64]
PlantArabidopsis thaliana135,000,000[65]135 Mb27,655[66]First plant genome sequenced, December 2000.[67]
PlantPopulus trichocarpa480,000,000480Mb73013First tree genome sequenced, September 2006[68]
PlantFritillaria assyriaca130,000,000,000130Gb
PlantParis japonica (Japanese-native, pale-petal)150,000,000,000150GbLargest plant genome known[69]
Plant – mossPhyscomitrella patens480,000,000480MbFirst genome of a bryophyte sequenced, January 2008.[70]
Fungus – yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae12,100,00012.1Mb6294First eukaryotic genome sequenced, 1996[71]
FungusAspergillus nidulans30,000,00030Mb9541[72]
NematodePratylenchus coffeae20,000,00020Mb[73] Smallest animal genome known[74]
NematodeCaenorhabditis elegans100,300,000100Mb19000First multicellular animal genome sequenced, December 1998[75]
InsectDrosophila melanogaster (fruit fly)175,000,000175Mb13600Size variation based on strain (175-180Mb; standard y w strain is 175Mb)[76]
InsectApis mellifera (honey bee)236,000,000236Mb10157[77]
InsectBombyx mori (silk moth)432,000,000432Mb1462314,623 predicted genes[78]
InsectSolenopsis invicta (fire ant)480,000,000480Mb16569[79]
MammalMus musculus2,700,000,0002.7Gb20210[80]
MammalHomo sapiens3,289,000,0003.3Gb20000Homo sapiens estimated genome size 3.2 billion bp[81]Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome[82]
MammalPan paniscus3,286,640,0003.3Gb20000Bonobo – estimated genome size 3.29 billion bp[83]
BirdGallus gallus1,043,000,0001.0Gb20000[84]
FishTetraodon nigroviridis (type of puffer fish)385,000,000390MbSmallest vertebrate genome known estimated to be 340 Mb[85][86] – 385 Mb.[87]
FishProtopterus aethiopicus (marbled lungfish)130,000,000,000130GbLargest vertebrate genome known

Genomic alterations[edit]

All the cells of an organism originate from a single cell, so they are expected to have identical genomes; however, in some cases, differences arise. Both the process of copying DNA during cell division and exposure to environmental mutagens can result in mutations in somatic cells. In some cases, such mutations lead to cancer because they cause cells to divide more quickly and invade surrounding tissues.[88] In certain lymphocytes in the human immune system, V(D)J recombination generates different genomic sequences such that each cell produces a unique antibody or T cell receptors.

During meiosis, diploid cells divide twice to produce haploid germ cells. During this process, recombination results in a reshuffling of the genetic material from homologous chromosomes so each gamete has a unique genome.

Genome-wide reprogramming[edit]

Genome-wide reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells involves epigenetic imprint erasure leading to totipotency. Reprogramming is facilitated by active DNA demethylation, a process that entails the DNA base excision repair pathway.[89] This pathway is employed in the erasure of CpG methylation (5mC) in primordial germ cells. The erasure of 5mC occurs via its conversion to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) driven by high levels of the ten-eleven dioxygenase enzymes TET1 and TET2.[90]

Genome evolution[edit]

Genomes are more than the sum of an organism’s genes and have traits that may be measured and studied without reference to the details of any particular genes and their products. Researchers compare traits such as karyotype (chromosome number), genome size, gene order, codon usage bias, and GC-content to determine what mechanisms could have produced the great variety of genomes that exist today (for recent overviews, see Brown 2002; Saccone and Pesole 2003; Benfey and Protopapas 2004; Gibson and Muse 2004; Reese 2004; Gregory 2005).

Duplications play a major role in shaping the genome. Duplication may range from extension of short tandem repeats, to duplication of a cluster of genes, and all the way to duplication of entire chromosomes or even entire genomes. Such duplications are probably fundamental to the creation of genetic novelty.

Horizontal gene transfer is invoked to explain how there is often an extreme similarity between small portions of the genomes of two organisms that are otherwise very distantly related. Horizontal gene transfer seems to be common among many microbes. Also, eukaryotic cells seem to have experienced a transfer of some genetic material from their chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes to their nuclear chromosomes. Recent empirical data suggest an important role of viruses and sub-viral RNA-networks to represent a main driving role to generate genetic novelty and natural genome editing.

In fiction[edit]

Works of science fiction illustrate concerns about the availability of genome sequences.

Michael Crichton’s 1990 novel Jurassic Park and the subsequent film tell the story of a billionaire who creates a theme park of cloned dinosaurs on a remote island, with disastrous outcomes. A geneticist extracts dinosaur DNA from the blood of ancient mosquitoes and fills in the gaps with DNA from modern species to create several species of dinosaurs. A chaos theorist is asked to give his expert opinion on the safety of engineering an ecosystem with the dinosaurs, and he repeatedly warns that the outcomes of the project will be unpredictable and ultimately uncontrollable. These warnings about the perils of using genomic information are a major theme of the book.

The 1997 film Gattaca is set in a futurist society where genomes of children are engineered to contain the most ideal combination of their parents’ traits, and metrics such as risk of heart disease and predicted life expectancy are documented for each person based on their genome. People conceived outside of the eugenics program, known as “In-Valids” suffer discrimination and are relegated to menial occupations. The protagonist of the film is an In-Valid who works to defy the supposed genetic odds and achieve his dream of working as a space navigator. The film warns against a future where genomic information fuels prejudice and extreme class differences between those who can and can’t afford genetically engineered children.[91]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Brosius, J (2009), “The Fragmented Gene”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1178 (1): 186–93, Bibcode:2009NYASA1178..186Bdoi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05004.xPMID 19845638
  2. ^ Ridley M (2006). Genome: the autobiography of a species in 23 chapters (PDF). New York: Harper Perennial. ISBN 978-0-06-019497-0. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 October 2018. Retrieved 11 May 2016.
  3. ^ Winkler HL (1920). Verbreitung und Ursache der Parthenogenesis im Pflanzen- und Tierreiche. Jena: Verlag Fischer.
  4. ^ “definition of Genome in Oxford dictionary”. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
  5. ^ Lederberg J, McCray AT (2001). “‘Ome Sweet ‘Omics – A Genealogical Treasury of Words” (PDF). The Scientist15 (7). Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 September 2006.
  6. ^ “All about genes”
  7. ^ “Genome Home”. 8 December 2010. Retrieved 27 January2011.
  8. ^ Zimmer C (18 December 2013). “Toe Fossil Provides Complete Neanderthal Genome”The New York Times. Retrieved 18 December 2013.
  9. ^ Prüfer K, Racimo F, Patterson N, Jay F, Sankararaman S, Sawyer S, et al. (January 2014). “The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains”Nature505 (7481): 43–49. Bibcode:2014Natur.505…43Pdoi:10.1038/nature12886PMC 4031459PMID 24352235.
  10. ^ Wade N (31 May 2007). “Genome of DNA Pioneer Is Deciphered”The New York Times. Retrieved 2 April 2010.
  11. ^ “What’s a Genome?”. 15 January 2003. Retrieved 27 January 2011.
  12. ^ NCBI_user_services (29 March 2004). “Mapping Factsheet”. Archived from the original on 19 July 2010. Retrieved 27 January2011.
  13. ^ Genome Reference Consortium. “Assembling the Genome”. Retrieved 23 August 2016.
  14. ^ Kaplan, Sarah (17 April 2016). “How do your 20,000 genes determine so many wildly different traits? They multitask”The Washington Post. Retrieved 27 August 2016.
  15. ^ Check Hayden, Erika (2015). “Scientists hope to attract millions to ‘DNA.LAND'”Naturedoi:10.1038/nature.2015.18514.
  16. ^ Zimmer, Carl. “Game of Genomes, Episode 13: Answers and Questions”. STAT. Retrieved 27 August 2016.
  17. ^ Gelderblom, Hans R. (1996). Medical Microbiology (4th ed.). Galveston, TX: The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston.
  18. ^ Samson RY, Bell SD (2014). “Archaeal chromosome biology”Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology24 (5–6): 420–27. doi:10.1159/000368854PMC 5175462PMID 25732343.
  19. ^ Chaconas G, Chen CW (2005). “Replication of Linear Bacterial Chromosomes: No Longer Going Around in Circles”The Bacterial Chromosome: 525–540. doi:10.1128/9781555817640.ch29ISBN 9781555812324.
  20. ^ “Bacterial Chromosomes”Microbial Genetics. 2002.
  21. Jump up to:a b Koonin EV, Wolf YI (July 2010). “Constraints and plasticity in genome and molecular-phenome evolution”Nature Reviews. Genetics11 (7): 487–98. doi:10.1038/nrg2810PMC 3273317PMID 20548290.
  22. ^ McCutcheon JP, Moran NA (November 2011). “Extreme genome reduction in symbiotic bacteria”. Nature Reviews. Microbiology10(1): 13–26. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2670PMID 22064560.
  23. ^ Land M, Hauser L, Jun SR, Nookaew I, Leuze MR, Ahn TH, Karpinets T, Lund O, Kora G, Wassenaar T, Poudel S, Ussery DW (March 2015). “Insights from 20 years of bacterial genome sequencing”Functional & Integrative Genomics15 (2): 141–61. doi:10.1007/s10142-015-0433-4PMC 4361730PMID 25722247.
  24. ^ “Scientists sequence asexual tiny worm whose lineage stretches back 18 million years”ScienceDaily. Retrieved 7 November2017.
  25. ^ Khandelwal S (March 1990). “Chromosome evolution in the genus Ophioglossum L.”. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society102 (3): 205–17. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1990.tb01876.x.
  26. Jump up to:a b c d e Lewin B (2004). Genes VIII (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-143981-8.
  27. ^ Naclerio G, Cangiano G, Coulson A, Levitt A, Ruvolo V, La Volpe A (July 1992). “Molecular and genomic organization of clusters of repetitive DNA sequences in Caenorhabditis elegans”. Journal of Molecular Biology226 (1): 159–68. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(92)90131-3PMID 1619649.
  28. ^ Stojanovic N, ed. (2007). Computational genomics : current methods. Wymondham: Horizon Bioscience. ISBN 978-1-904933-30-4.
  29. Jump up to:a b c Padeken J, Zeller P, Gasser SM (April 2015). “Repeat DNA in genome organization and stability”. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development31: 12–19. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2015.03.009PMID 25917896.
  30. Jump up to:a b Usdin K (July 2008). “The biological effects of simple tandem repeats: lessons from the repeat expansion diseases”Genome Research18 (7): 1011–19. doi:10.1101/gr.070409.107PMC 3960014PMID 18593815.
  31. ^ Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, Beiles A, Nevo E (December 2002). “Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review”. Molecular Ecology11 (12): 2453–65. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01643.xPMID 12453231.
  32. Jump up to:a b Wessler SR (November 2006). “Transposable elements and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America103 (47): 17600–01. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10317600Wdoi:10.1073/pnas.0607612103PMC 1693792PMID 17101965.
  33. Jump up to:a b c d e Kazazian HH (March 2004). “Mobile elements: drivers of genome evolution”Science303 (5664): 1626–32. Bibcode:2004Sci…303.1626Kdoi:10.1126/science.1089670PMID 15016989.
  34. ^ Deininger PL, Moran JV, Batzer MA, Kazazian HH (December 2003). “Mobile elements and mammalian genome evolution”. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development13 (6): 651–58. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2003.10.013PMID 14638329.
  35. ^ Kidwell MG, Lisch DR (March 2000). “Transposable elements and host genome evolution”. Trends in Ecology & Evolution15 (3): 95–99. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01817-0PMID 10675923.
  36. ^ Richard GF, Kerrest A, Dujon B (December 2008). “Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes”Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews72(4): 686–727. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00011-08PMC 2593564PMID 19052325.
  37. ^ Cordaux R, Batzer MA (October 2009). “The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution”Nature Reviews. Genetics10 (10): 691–703. doi:10.1038/nrg2640PMC 2884099PMID 19763152.
  38. ^ Han JS, Boeke JD (August 2005). “LINE-1 retrotransposons: modulators of quantity and quality of mammalian gene expression?”. BioEssays27 (8): 775–84. doi:10.1002/bies.20257PMID 16015595.
  39. ^ “Human genome”. Retrieved 19 August 2016.
  40. ^ Gregory TR, Nicol JA, Tamm H, Kullman B, Kullman K, Leitch IJ, Murray BG, Kapraun DF, Greilhuber J, Bennett MD (January 2007). “Eukaryotic genome size databases”Nucleic Acids Research35 (Database issue): D332–38. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl828PMC 1669731PMID 17090588.
  41. ^ Glass JI, Assad-Garcia N, Alperovich N, Yooseph S, Lewis MR, Maruf M, Hutchison CA, Smith HO, Venter JC (January 2006). “Essential genes of a minimal bacterium”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America103 (2): 425–30. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103..425Gdoi:10.1073/pnas.0510013103PMC 1324956PMID 16407165.
  42. ^ Forster AC, Church GM (2006). “Towards synthesis of a minimal cell”Molecular Systems Biology2 (1): 45. doi:10.1038/msb4100090PMC 1681520PMID 16924266.
  43. ^ Mankertz P (2008). “Molecular Biology of Porcine Circoviruses”Animal Viruses: Molecular Biology. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-22-6.
  44. ^ Fiers W, Contreras R, Duerinck F, Haegeman G, Iserentant D, Merregaert J, Min Jou W, Molemans F, Raeymaekers A, Van den Berghe A, Volckaert G, Ysebaert M (April 1976). “Complete nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage MS2 RNA: primary and secondary structure of the replicase gene”. Nature260 (5551): 500–07. Bibcode:1976Natur.260..500Fdoi:10.1038/260500a0PMID 1264203.
  45. ^ Fiers W, Contreras R, Haegemann G, Rogiers R, Van de Voorde A, Van Heuverswyn H, Van Herreweghe J, Volckaert G, Ysebaert M (May 1978). “Complete nucleotide sequence of SV40 DNA”. Nature273 (5658): 113–20. Bibcode:1978Natur.273..113Fdoi:10.1038/273113a0PMID 205802.
  46. ^ Sanger F, Air GM, Barrell BG, Brown NL, Coulson AR, Fiddes CA, Hutchison CA, Slocombe PM, Smith M (February 1977). “Nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage phi X174 DNA”. Nature265 (5596): 687–95. Bibcode:1977Natur.265..687Sdoi:10.1038/265687a0PMID 870828.
  47. ^ “Virology – Human Immunodeficiency Virus And Aids, Structure: The Genome And Proteins Of HIV”. 1 July 2010. Retrieved 27 January 2011.
  48. ^ Thomason L, Court DL, Bubunenko M, Costantino N, Wilson H, Datta S, Oppenheim A (April 2007). “Recombineering: genetic engineering in bacteria using homologous recombination”Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Chapter 1: Unit 1.16. doi:10.1002/0471142727.mb0116s78ISBN 978-0-471-14272-0PMID 18265390.
  49. ^ Court DL, Oppenheim AB, Adhya SL (January 2007). “A new look at bacteriophage lambda genetic networks”Journal of Bacteriology189 (2): 298–304. doi:10.1128/JB.01215-06PMC 1797383PMID 17085553.
  50. ^ Sanger F, Coulson AR, Hong GF, Hill DF, Petersen GB (December 1982). “Nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage lambda DNA”. Journal of Molecular Biology162 (4): 729–73. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90546-0PMID 6221115.
  51. ^ Legendre M, Arslan D, Abergel C, Claverie JM (January 2012). “Genomics of Megavirus and the elusive fourth domain of Life”Communicative & Integrative Biology5 (1): 102–06. doi:10.4161/cib.18624PMC 3291303PMID 22482024.
  52. ^ Philippe N, Legendre M, Doutre G, Couté Y, Poirot O, Lescot M, Arslan D, Seltzer V, Bertaux L, Bruley C, Garin J, Claverie JM, Abergel C (July 2013). “Pandoraviruses: amoeba viruses with genomes up to 2.5 Mb reaching that of parasitic eukaryotes”Science341 (6143): 281–86. Bibcode:2013Sci…341..281Pdoi:10.1126/science.1239181PMID 23869018.
  53. ^ Bennett GM, Moran NA (5 August 2013). “Small, smaller, smallest: the origins and evolution of ancient dual symbioses in a Phloem-feeding insect”Genome Biology and Evolution5 (9): 1675–88. doi:10.1093/gbe/evt118PMC 3787670PMID 23918810.
  54. ^ Shigenobu S, Watanabe H, Hattori M, Sakaki Y, Ishikawa H (September 2000). “Genome sequence of the endocellular bacterial symbiont of aphids Buchnera sp. APS”. Nature407(6800): 81–86. doi:10.1038/35024074PMID 10993077.
  55. ^ Fleischmann RD, Adams MD, White O, Clayton RA, Kirkness EF, Kerlavage AR, Bult CJ, Tomb JF, Dougherty BA, Merrick JM (July 1995). “Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd”Science269 (5223): 496–512. Bibcode:1995Sci…269..496Fdoi:10.1126/science.7542800PMID 7542800.
  56. ^ Blattner FR, Plunkett G, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M, et al. (September 1997). “The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12”. Science277 (5331): 1453–62. doi:10.1126/science.277.5331.1453PMID 9278503.
  57. ^ Challacombe JF, Eichorst SA, Hauser L, Land M, Xie G, Kuske CR (15 September 2011). Steinke D (ed.). “Biological consequences of ancient gene acquisition and duplication in the large genome of Candidatus Solibacter usitatus Ellin6076”PLOS ONE6 (9): e24882. Bibcode:2011PLoSO…624882Cdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024882PMC 3174227PMID 21949776.
  58. ^ Rocap G, Larimer FW, Lamerdin J, Malfatti S, Chain P, Ahlgren NA, et al. (August 2003). “Genome divergence in two Prochlorococcus ecotypes reflects oceanic niche differentiation”. Nature424 (6952): 1042–47. Bibcode:2003Natur.424.1042Rdoi:10.1038/nature01947PMID 12917642.
  59. ^ Dufresne A, Salanoubat M, Partensky F, Artiguenave F, Axmann IM, Barbe V, et al. (August 2003). “Genome sequence of the cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus marinus SS120, a nearly minimal oxyphototrophic genome”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America100 (17): 10020–25. Bibcode:2003PNAS..10010020Ddoi:10.1073/pnas.1733211100PMC 187748PMID 12917486.
  60. ^ Meeks JC, Elhai J, Thiel T, Potts M, Larimer F, Lamerdin J, Predki P, Atlas R (2001). “An overview of the genome of Nostoc punctiforme, a multicellular, symbiotic cyanobacterium”. Photosynthesis Research70 (1): 85–106. doi:10.1023/A:1013840025518PMID 16228364.
  61. ^ Parfrey LW, Lahr DJ, Katz LA (April 2008). “The dynamic nature of eukaryotic genomes”Molecular Biology and Evolution25 (4): 787–94. doi:10.1093/molbev/msn032PMC 2933061PMID 18258610.
  62. ^ ScienceShot: Biggest Genome Ever Archived 11 October 2010 at the Wayback Machine, comments: “The measurement for Amoeba dubia and other protozoa which have been reported to have very large genomes were made in the 1960s using a rough biochemical approach which is now considered to be an unreliable method for accurate genome size determinations.”
  63. ^ Anderson S, Bankier AT, Barrell BG, de Bruijn MH, Coulson AR, Drouin J, Eperon IC, Nierlich DP, Roe BA, Sanger F, Schreier PH, Smith AJ, Staden R, Young IG (April 1981). “Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome”. Nature290(5806): 457–65. Bibcode:1981Natur.290..457Adoi:10.1038/290457a0PMID 7219534.
  64. ^ Fleischmann A, Michael TP, Rivadavia F, Sousa A, Wang W, Temsch EM, Greilhuber J, Müller KF, Heubl G (December 2014). “Evolution of genome size and chromosome number in the carnivorous plant genus Genlisea (Lentibulariaceae), with a new estimate of the minimum genome size in angiosperms”Annals of Botany114 (8): 1651–63. doi:10.1093/aob/mcu189PMC 4649684PMID 25274549.
  65. ^ “Genome Assembly”The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR).
  66. ^ “Details – Arabidopsis thaliana – Ensembl Genomes 40”
  67. ^ Greilhuber J, Borsch T, Müller K, Worberg A, Porembski S, Barthlott W (November 2006). “Smallest angiosperm genomes found in lentibulariaceae, with chromosomes of bacterial size”. Plant Biology8 (6): 770–77. doi:10.1055/s-2006-924101PMID 17203433.
  68. ^ Tuskan GA, Difazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, Hellsten U, et al. (September 2006). “The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray)” (PDF). Science313 (5793): 1596–604. Bibcode:2006Sci…313.1596Tdoi:10.1126/science.1128691PMID 16973872.
  69. ^ Pellicer J, Fay MF, Leitch IJ (15 September 2010). “The largest eukaryotic genome of them all?”. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society164 (1): 10–15. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01072.x.
  70. ^ Lang D, Zimmer AD, Rensing SA, Reski R (October 2008). “Exploring plant biodiversity: the Physcomitrella genome and beyond”. Trends in Plant Science13 (10): 542–49. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.07.002PMID 18762443.
  71. ^ “Saccharomyces Genome Database”. Retrieved 27 January 2011.
  72. ^ Galagan JE, Calvo SE, Cuomo C, Ma LJ, Wortman JR, Batzoglou S, et al. (December 2005). “Sequencing of Aspergillus nidulans and comparative analysis with A. fumigatus and A. oryzae”. Nature438 (7071): 1105–15. Bibcode:2005Natur.438.1105Gdoi:10.1038/nature04341PMID 16372000.
  73. ^ Leroy S, Bouamer S, Morand S, Fargette M (2007). “Genome size of plant-parasitic nematodes”. Nematology9 (3): 449–50. doi:10.1163/156854107781352089.
  74. ^ Gregory TR (2005). “Animal Genome Size Database”. Gregory, T.R. (2016). Animal Genome Size Database.
  75. ^ The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium (December 1998). “Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology”Science282 (5396): 2012–18. doi:10.1126/science.282.5396.2012PMID 9851916.
  76. ^ Ellis LL, Huang W, Quinn AM, Ahuja A, Alfrejd B, Gomez FE, Hjelmen CE, Moore KL, Mackay TF, Johnston JS, Tarone AM (July 2014). “Intrapopulation genome size variation in D. melanogaster reflects life history variation and plasticity”PLoS Genetics10(7): e1004522. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004522PMC 4109859PMID 25057905.
  77. ^ Honeybee Genome Sequencing Consortium (October 2006). “Insights into social insects from the genome of the honeybee Apis mellifera”Nature443 (7114): 931–49. Bibcode:2006Natur.443..931Tdoi:10.1038/nature05260PMC 2048586PMID 17073008.
  78. ^ The International Silkworm Genome (December 2008). “The genome of a lepidopteran model insect, the silkworm Bombyx mori”. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology38 (12): 1036–45. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2008.11.004PMID 19121390.
  79. ^ Wurm Y, Wang J, Riba-Grognuz O, Corona M, Nygaard S, Hunt BG, et al. (April 2011). “The genome of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America108 (14): 5679–84. Bibcode:2011PNAS..108.5679Wdoi:10.1073/pnas.1009690108PMC 3078418PMID 21282665.
  80. ^ Church DM, Goodstadt L, Hillier LW, Zody MC, Goldstein S, She X, et al. (May 2009). Roberts RJ (ed.). “Lineage-specific biology revealed by a finished genome assembly of the mouse”PLoS Biology7 (5): e1000112. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000112PMC 2680341PMID 19468303.
  81. ^ “Human Genome Project Information Site Has Been Updated”. 23 July 2013. Archived from the original on 20 September 2008. Retrieved 6 February 2014.
  82. ^ Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Mural RJ, Sutton GG, et al. (February 2001). “The sequence of the human genome”. Science291 (5507): 1304–51. Bibcode:2001Sci…291.1304Vdoi:10.1126/science.1058040PMID 11181995.
  83. ^ “Pan paniscus (pygmy chimpanzee)”. Retrieved 30 June 2016.
  84. ^ International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium (December 2004). “Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution”. Nature432 (7018): 695–716. doi:10.1038/nature03154ISSN 0028-0836PMID 15592404.
  85. ^ Roest Crollius H, Jaillon O, Dasilva C, Ozouf-Costaz C, Fizames C, Fischer C, Bouneau L, Billault A, Quetier F, Saurin W, Bernot A, Weissenbach J (July 2000). “Characterization and repeat analysis of the compact genome of the freshwater pufferfish Tetraodon nigroviridis”Genome Research10 (7): 939–49. doi:10.1101/gr.10.7.939PMC 310905PMID 10899143.
  86. ^ Jaillon O, Aury JM, Brunet F, Petit JL, Stange-Thomann N, Mauceli E, et al. (October 2004). “Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype”. Nature431 (7011): 946–57. Bibcode:2004Natur.431..946Jdoi:10.1038/nature03025PMID 15496914.
  87. ^ “Tetraodon Project Information”. Archived from the originalon 26 September 2012. Retrieved 17 October 2012.
  88. ^ Martincorena I, Campbell PJ (September 2015). “Somatic mutation in cancer and normal cells”. Science349 (6255): 1483–89. Bibcode:2015Sci…349.1483Mdoi:10.1126/science.aab4082PMID 26404825.
  89. ^ Hajkova P, Jeffries SJ, Lee C, Miller N, Jackson SP, Surani MA (July 2010). “Genome-wide reprogramming in the mouse germ line entails the base excision repair pathway”Science329 (5987): 78–82. doi:10.1126/science.1187945PMC 3863715PMID 20595612.
  90. ^ Hackett JA, Sengupta R, Zylicz JJ, Murakami K, Lee C, Down TA, Surani MA (January 2013). “Germline DNA demethylation dynamics and imprint erasure through 5-hydroxymethylcytosine”Science339 (6118): 448–52. doi:10.1126/science.1229277PMC 3847602PMID 23223451.
  91. ^ “Gattaca (movie)”Rotten Tomatoes.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Genome
Authority control GND4156640-3LCCNsh85053924NDL01009114


Navigation menu




In other projects



Edit links


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s